National AIDS Coordinating Agency (NACA)
Questions of the National Evaluation Agenda
Prevention
| • |
To what extent are the following prevention interventions accessible (ie., geographical reach, utility and user friendliness) across the country? |
| • |
Intervention Priority Areas: VCT, routine HIV testing, youth VCT PWP, PMTCT, male involvement, BCIC |
| • |
Secondary priority: life skills, workplace, blood safety |
| • |
To what extent have the prevention interventions as prioritized above led to adoption of key HIV prevention behaviour? |
Treatment, Care and Support
| • |
To what extent is the ART rollout and the three delivery models (physician, nurse, outsource) cost effective and increasing access to services?
|
| • |
To what extent do local level referral systems and operational processes strengthen the linkages and coordination of services between counseling and Testing, CHBC, PMTCT, TB and ART?
|
Management of National Response
| • |
To what extent are civil society programs addressing the identified gaps in the national response to HIV AND AIDS and how is that influencing civil society’s participation and engagement in the response?
|
| • |
What is the level of harmonization and alignment among all international partners that are providing external monetary or technical support for the HIV response and how does that influence the national response to the HIV epidemic? |
Psychosocial and Economic Impact Mitigation
| • |
To what extent are ART, Care and support programs (public and NGO) providing adequate, standard and quality psychological counseling according to available guidelines and protocols?
|
| • |
To what extent are services provided by the OVC programs (public and NGO) improving the level of school enrollment, retention and how does that influence the lives of registered OVCs? |
|
|
The M&E Division is currently exploring ways of operationalizing these questions further and identifying competent service providers to implement them.
Printable version